Digital Consultancy, Online Marketing from iON

Top

Results Driven Experience

  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Clients
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Blog categories »
  • Advertising »
  • Business Startup Ideas »
  • Email Marketing »
  • iONTube »
  • Marketing »
  • Mobile »
  • Online Marketing »
  • Online PR »
  • Permission Marketing »
  • SEO »
  • Social Media »
  • Websites »

Websites

We have opinions. Lots of them. Some of them are even correct. Find out what we have to say about what’s new with digital marketing and strategy, pat us on the back when you agree, challenge us when you don’t.

Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

by Niall McKeown on 23.11.2011

Most marketing managers choose their web partner using old scoring criteria.  They usually ask for a beauty parade of previous work and select the web agency that can make their company look good as well as having a really good Content Management System (CMS).

The problem is, the marketing managers customers don’t care so much for how pretty their website is.  In fact none of her customers visit the website to admire it.  They all come to find answer to their questions and over 95% of the time those answers come in the form of words.

Profitable websites are usually functional and ugly.  The web team works relentlessly to give the customer the information they desire ahead of information the organisation would like to promote.  They understand that form and function trumps beauty.  They craft words and navigation like sculptors hug marble.

So why are the scoring criteria for selecting a web agency not based upon journalism skills, analysis abilities and an agency that knows the marketing managers competitive landscape?  Surly these are far more important than a good CMS and lavish photography. I’m not saying the aesthetic design is irrelevant, it’s just that creative writing and researching exactly what the customer wants from your web presence is much more important.

 

2 Examples of massively profitable yet aesthetically ugly websites

booking.com  Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

Booking.com It's no Mona Lisa yet functionally brilliant

Part of Priceline.com, they announce 9 month sales in November 2011 of $3,3 Billion up from $2.3 Billion a year earlier.

 

 

amazon Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

As pretty as a building site but simple to navigate

Amazon, king of customer journey, relevance and leveraging social relationships with the customers by way of user ratings.

 

3 Examples mattress websites: Pretty, Average & Ugly

visprung Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

Pretty or Pretty Useless? The mattress and bed site doesn't list availability and price

The Vi-Spring website doesn’t offer the customer any information on price or availability.  They want the customer to call them.  No doubt the orginisation doesn’t want to upset its retailers, but doesn’t mind upsetting its eventual consumers by failing to handle the consumers core tasks.

 

feather and black Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

A much better effort but fails on function

 

The Feather & Black website at least gives availability and price but then it over complicates the sale by asking the customer to choose their favourite bed tension. Oh, I’ll have a 6.5 please!  My guess says 75% shopping cart abandonment at this point. Few consumers know or wish to learn the meaning of the world bed tension scale.

 

beds Why Profitable Websites are Usually Ugly

Probably the most ugly yet successful and profitable mattress website out of the three

 

If I was a betting man, I would put my money on Beds.ie as being the most profitable website from the three mattress examples, yet it is by far the ‘most ugly’. It gives the customer everything they need to make a decision.

Posted in: BlogWebsites | No Comments
Share

Why £20,000 Per Week E-Commerce Businesses Often Don’t Make Money

by Niall McKeown on 18.09.2011

It’s AWESOME! Make an e-commerce website and work ferociously on it until it’s turning over £20,000 per week. What you’ve achieved is to create envy and admiration from your past co-workers hailing your success. The new business is your pension. It’s living the dream!

No one can take away the fact that starting any business of any kind is a horrendous amount of work but seriously rewarding and more fun than fun itself. The attraction of running an e-commerce business is as tempting as a light bulb to a moth, dazzling and hypnotic. Running the spreadsheets for the sales forecasts seduces you into thinking that you just can’t fail. All’s that’s needed is the website, some stock and customers.

Imagine you choose to sell office machinery and computers. You source good brands at a reasonable price. You go online and spend £30,000 on a scalable ecommerce site and promotion. By a stroke of luck, and propelled by AdWords your getting lots of customers to the site and with a good proportion of those visitors purchasing. How would the figures look?

Sales average £20,000 per week

Total revenue per annum = £ 1,040,000

Margin on office machines and computers 20%
Giving you £200,800 gross

Costs & Reductions Include:
AdWords costs £5000 per month
Warehousing & rates £2500 per month
Returns of 15% per month £3,000 per month
Wages: Web manager, Customer Services and You £7500 per month
Technology requirements, hosting and stock management £1,000
Net Loss: £27,200

I have no doubt that you could jiggle some extra millage out of costs but the point remains the same, it’s never as bright as the headline makes out. I see these kind of numbers quite often when helping firms turn around their e-commerce strategy.

The clear opportunity lies in selling unique items to a niche market. The cost of the advertising is less, word of mouth marketing more effective, social and email marketing prevail and margins tend to be a lot higher. The only challenge faced now is to what niche is being unfulfilled and how can you do it better than anyone else in that market.

 

Follow the author, Niall McKeown on Twitter

Posted in: BlogOnline MarketingWebsites | 1 Comments
Share

Why Web Projects Fail

by Niall McKeown on 02.09.2011
best Why Web Projects Fail

Promotion is better than passive when trying to 'get a message out'

“We want to use the web to get our message out there” explains the CEO to her management team.  This instruction, left unchanged is almost certainly the beginning of a failed web project, a disheartened management team and a faultless web team left to carry the responsibility for the leadership’s misunderstanding of how digital marketing works.

On the web, the reader doesn’t listen to your message.  On the web, the reader point blank refuses to listen to your shouts.  The reader has only one agenda and that is to seek answers to their own questions and find solutions to their tasks.

Search engines think the same way as the reader.  They reward websites that get to the point and answer the readers’ questions most effectively.  The search engines ignore irrelevant-shouting message websites and reward the best, most relevant content with the top spots in its search positioning.

 

The obvious examples of how an organisation misunderstands how the web works can be found on most local council websites. Council websites usually report on the movements of the mayor, a civic reception, local events or election results. The majority of the citizens really want to use the council website to find out when their bin is being collected, when the leisure center is open and how to report a fault.

 

The misalignment between customer desire and the council wanting to ‘get their message out’ results in a massive bounce rate off the site as the reader hits that back button and Googles again. It causes frustration for the reader and the reader dislikes the brand.

 

A website is a passive communications channel best implemented to give readers answers to their questions.  Creating a website as the primary means to ‘get your message out’ to an audience, is in most cases setting the web project on foundations of failure.  A better approach by the CEO would be to say, “We want to use the web to help our customers, simplify their lives and help them get what they need done as efficiently as possible”.

 

Follow the author Niall McKeown on Twitter

Posted in: Online MarketingUncategorizedWebsites | No Comments
Share

Revolutionary Web Design

by Niall McKeown on 07.07.2011

Why are so few organisations happy with their website? I hear it all the time. “We are just in the middle of redesigning our website”.  When I ask companies what is actually broken with their existing website they rarely have an answer beyond “we don’t like the design”.  It’s never because their bounce rate is too high or conversion/goal ratios can’t be improved any further under the current site structure.

This subjective decision-making process often leads to a call for a revolution.  “Out with the old and in with the new” is the cry as the organisation goes out to tender for a new, cooler web design agency.

And this is how the revolution usually works, starting with a call for a New Website…

web revolution Revolutionary Web Design

The revolution usually starts with the selection of the agency that can produce the most visually pleasing design and has the best, easiest to use Content Management System.  Unfortunately evidence proves customers do not go to a website to look at the design nor do they care about the technology platform.  So why do we so often critique our web strategy around these two important but less essential elements that contribute to web success?

Amazon isn’t a pretty site.  It doesn’t win design awards but it sure knows how to help customers! They don’t have teams of web designers.  They have teams of people teeming over data.  Data that gives them insight to what customers want from their web presence and how they can convert more prospects to becoming customers.  They take these findings and slowly, painstakingly they evolve their web strategy using evidence and planning combined to improve performance.

And without a single change in interface design or technology layer, Amazon sets about an evolution of continuous improvement.  They evolve one small step at a time using meaningful Key Performance Indicators as their guide.

incremental improvement Revolutionary Web Design

Whether you’re in consumer or business marketing, there are only two digital strategy techniques.  Either go with an evidence based, hard work, evolution strategy or go for a subjective based web design revolution strategy.  One type of strategy pleases the customer, the other pleases the owners of the website.

Posted in: BlogWebsites | No Comments
Share

Websites; you used to be cool, man

by admin on 08.06.2011

The digital marketing industry networking event is not for the naïve or the faint hearted.  Over canapés and bubbly it’s important to be seen to be saying the right things.  “Oh we’re using the new Web 3.0 paradigm shift to really maximise RoI on QR Codes integrated with Augmented Reality via a social media flash mob strategy – it’s going to go viral”.

This may cause most of us to struggle to keep our canapés down, but not this cliché hardened massif.  If you are wanting to see some subtly flavoured garlic olives stuck in throats, just say something about websites.  “Oh I’m working with a client to make their website easier to use” or “We’re carrying out a content audit on a website to clear off the stuff which isn’t resonating with customers” may result in an impromptu Heimlick manoeuvre.  You might well elicit a reaction similar to Ali G’s when presented with a certain brand of running shoe “wait a minute, it ain’t 1995 anymore”.

Back in the 90s things were different all right.  The www was a pup, it was all new, search marketing and email marketing were in early infancy and websites were all the rage.  We were as cliché ridden back then as we are now, of course, but at least we were allowed to talk about websites without being laughed off the streets.  However as the variety of online channels has continued to grow we’ve somehow become less and less interested in focussing on websites, despite their foundational importance to everything we do online.

This would be OK if the general standard of websites was improving.  But they’re not getting better.  In too many heartbreaking cases they are getting worse.

We all know this to be true.  As punters we all spend a disproportionate amount of time on websites lost.

What’s more, the humble website remains the most common ultimate destination for nearly every online marketing channel.  Where should best practice search engine optimisation lead people?  To various pages on your website.  What about Pay Per Click?  Generally, to landing pages on your website.  Email marketing?  Pages on your website.  Social, affiliate, video, banner ads?  You’ve got it, pages on your website.

In other words, your website remains at the hub of all of your online marketing activity.

If your site is converting 2%, how long are you going to wait until you work hard to push that up to 3% or beyond?  How much traffic can you afford to waste before you eventually recognise that you cannot make the other channels pay if you don’t ensure that an ongoing program of website optimisation and improvement is at the heart of your online marketing strategy.

Websites might well be the online equivalent of previous X-Factor winners; they’re not cool any more, their day in the sun has long passed and their 15 seconds of fame is but a distant memory.  It might be cooler to talk about all the new stuff, but they remain the foundation upon which all online marketing is built.  Lose interest in yours at your peril.

Posted in: BlogOnline MarketingWebsites | 1 Comments
Share

An Irish Example of How Offline Marketing Drives Online Activity

by Niall McKeown on 30.05.2011

I had the good fortune to visit the Google offices in New York in May 2009.  During my conversations with the Google Search folks, I asked, “Do you see search patterns changing throughout the day?” Sue from Google replied, “We sure do.  Do want to know what causes spikes in search more than anything else?” “Sure” I replied.  “Oprah!” she exclaimed.

The argument that traditional media is in decline and digital is its replacement has, by every experienced marketer, been accepted as simply untrue.  TV and other offline channels create demand online.

Back home in Ireland, a local insurance firm called FBD are taking on the big brands.  Their multi-channel offline and online marketing is causing their brand name to trend along with generic search terms for insurance.

home insurance An Irish Example of How Offline Marketing Drives Online Activity

Their smart, creative Above The Line campaign taps into many local sensitivities and the call-to-action to go online is backed up with comprehensive digital activity and a website that immediately answers the customer’s core tasks.

Being top of brand search for a low interest category against global giants such as Aviva, Allianz and Tesco takes more than just appearing on TV though.  It takes creativity and an ability to find context with the audience.  It takes multiple marketing channels playing in symphony, supporting each other.It takes brand values being expressed consistently.

Most important of all, underpinning all of this activity takes a framework and strategy.

Posted in: AdvertisingBlogMarketingOnline MarketingSEOSocial MediaWebsites | No Comments
Share

Brand hasn’t gone away you know

by admin on 16.05.2011

Analytics evangelists have done a tremendous job in shaking the marketing profession out of bland or meaningless online success measurements, but in their quest for micro-measurability, some are in danger of overlooking sales psychology and oversimplifying human buying behaviour.

Zoe, aged 15, wants a mobile phone, and her only chance of affording one is to get her father in a weak moment to cough up the mullah.  She goes online and researches various mobile phone websites, searching by brand and checking out what Apple, HTC and Nokia have to offer.  She posts on Facebook that she’s looking for a new phone and asks her friends what’s hot and what’s not.  She identifies a phone that she would like, she prints out its specification in PDF format, and she puts it on a tray at the weekend as she gives her poor oul Da breakfast in bed.  He breaks, and buys her the phone online later that day.

In order to buy the phone, Zoe used search engines, social media and web to research, and a website to buy.  So which channel is responsible for the sale?  They all are.  And we haven’t even started to think about above the line marketing which means that those brands were in her mind in the first place.  And then there’s the tiny matter of product desirability.  And so it goes on.

You’re the marketer at Nokia and you want to get more sales from Zoe’s friends, and you have marketing budget to make this happen.  As a result of her buying process, which platform do you change your tactics on, or invest more money in?  I don’t know the full answer to the question but I do know it’s more complex than going into Google Analytics, seeing that initially Zoe visited you via a search engine, and therefore concluding that you should invest more money in SEO and PPC.

A Northern Ireland based insurance company uses the web to win business, by running a website which includes a quotation engine, email marketing, search engine optimisation and appearing on price comparison websites.  They are cost competitive, however they are not the cheapest in that cutthroat marketplace.

Virtually all of their online sales leads come from price comparison engines, and nearly all of their online sales come from Northern Ireland, even though their price comparison information is displayed throughout the UK.

So why do many people in NI go on to get in touch, whereas much fewer people in GB feel motivated to move to the next step?  The answer is brand.  (Of course many GB insurers have different prices for NI, but the pattern is still visible versus their NI competitors.)  They consistently advertise on television and on billboards.

The war continues to rage in the world of affiliate marketing about whether the affiliate network responsible for the “first click” (thus responsible for presenting a company’s price at the start of the sales process) or the “last click” (thus responsible for closing the sale) should get the commission when a customer buys a product via their platform.  The reason this war seems unlikely to end any time soon is because sales is way more complex that this simplistic model can tolerate.

Analytics are tremendously strong in helping us understand the latter stages of the buying process, and of driving efficiency via a program of optimisation into our search, affiliate, social and web activities.  We can clearly identify where customers drop off, where they get frustrated, where they leave and go elsewhere.  And whilst we should embrace this measurability in pursuit of happier customers and increased sales, we should never overlook the role that reputation and brand plays in driving desire and expectation in the first place.

Posted in: AdvertisingBlogMarketingOnline MarketingOnline PRPermission MarketingSEOSocial MediaWebsites | No Comments
Share

Maximizing the Value From Your Website with Gerry McGovern

by admin on 20.04.2011

gerry df2011 Maximizing the Value From Your Website with Gerry McGovernSpeaker: Gerry McGovern, Customer Carewords
Duration: 53.29 mins
Filmed: 30.3.2011
Topics:
From Digital Future 2011, Gerry argues that successful websites relentlessly focus on caring for the customer by connecting with them on the things which really matter.

(more…)

Posted in: BlogiONTubeWebsites | No Comments
Share

Writing for the Google gods

by Niall McKeown on 16.02.2011

It’s not unusual to hear organisations claiming that they have ghostwriters creating web optimized content for their blogs and website.  Quite often the ghostwriter has no passion for the organisation and is often grinding out content with three main aims in mind.

The first aim is to create content that covers all of the topics suggested by their contractor.  Put simply, create content that has some level of relevance to the website it serves.

The second aim is to script content that is choc-full of buzzwords that match the “keywords” the organisation would like to rank highly for in search engines.

The third and final task the ghostwriter has to perform is to create their prose with a certain magical word count (between 200 and 400) in order to curry favour with the search engines.

Are we to think that with all the financial wealth and abundance of geniuses and resource Google and others have put into Search that the best they can come up with is to rank uninteresting, keyword stuffed websites above quality customer focused websites with content written with the reader in mind?

Do we believe there is a great Google deity classifying our website as good or bad based solely on repetition of keywords, document length and a plethora of irrelevant inbound links? I don’t think so.  I think this deity is a lot smarter than that!

google god Writing for the Google gods

There is a need to build a website with the architecture, structure and standards that make it easier for search engines to understand but even this specialism now carries less favour than simple sites with top quality content designed for the customer.

In the example below, Traffic Watch NI has given no effort to optimize itself for search, yet for the generic search term “traffic northern ireland” it appears ahead of the highly search engine optimized BBC website performing the same task.  The reasons for this can be argued but in my opinion it boils down to Traffic Watch NI being the Voice of Authority on the topic regardless of its SEO credentials, thus Google gives it preference.

google traffic watch ni Writing for the Google gods

In conclusion, create content for the reader, not the search engine.  Be a Voice of Authority in your specialist area.  Create content that answers the reader’s questions and inspires them to share with others.

P.S. this blog post is exactly 400 words by accident icon smile Writing for the Google gods

Posted in: BlogPermission MarketingSEOSocial MediaWebsites | No Comments
Share

Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom

by admin on 09.02.2011

Larry and Sergey have managed to build one of the most valuable web properties in the world because whilst the rest of us have been getting excited about fads and tools, they have been obsessive in their quest for relevancy and desire to put their customers first.  Their culture of bucking trends when their scientific feedback goes against convention is to be celebrated and should be replicated by all online marketers.

Convention says Search Engine Optimisation must be part of every online marketing strategy.  Google is ranked sixth on itself for the term “search engines” after Dog Pile, Bing, AltaVista, and a Wikipedia explanation about what a search engine is.  Does Dog Pile take business from Google because they’re ranked higher than them for that generic term?  Not a chance, because Google know that the ability to serve the customer, and reputation management trumps clumsy SEO every time.  Google says we’re not even in the top three if you search for “search engines” because it’s not a channel through which our customers seek to find us.

Convention says you get the welcome message on the home page to help people experience the warmth of your brand.  It would be interesting to speculate what such a welcome message might say?  Does the following look all too familiar?

google home normal Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom google home welcome Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom

“Thank you for visiting Google.  We hope that you enjoy visiting our website.  We have a range of exciting products and services for you to enjoy, including search, image search, blogging tools and email.  Please don’t hesitate to get in touch for more information.”

They could at least be honest and play with us for a bit of sport?

google home very very rich Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom google home 20bn Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom
google home ten zeroes Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom google home we own you Why Google Challenges us to Confront Accepted Wisdom

Google says no one gives a damn about being welcomed and is on your site to get the job done.  In Google’s case, the job is search and that’s all anyone cares about.

Convention says you promote your range of services as widely as possible as quickly as possible.  If you have expertise in online search, online documents, spreadsheets, presentations, maps, directions, analytics, blogs, video, calendar, photos, translate and finance, you make sure that this is widely promoted on the home page and on the menu system within the “three click rule”.  Google says the majority of their customers go to their home page to search and they shall be served above all other considerations.

Convention says your logo is the visual representation of your brand, which must never be compromised and must consist of a layout, a colour palette and strict application guidelines.  Google says our customers don’t have the slightest bit of interest in the colour palette of our logo and we’re going to change our logo regularly for a bit of fun to reflect current cultural, political and sporting occasions.

Convention says you take the order always.  If you have a customer who wants to buy something from you, you always sell it, even if it’s not what they want or not what they need.  If you are a media owner and someone wants to advertise with you and your demographics do not match their target, take the money and run.  Google says we take the order for the Pay Per Click advert only when statistics reinforce that a minimum threshold of customers are interested.

Again and again successful online marketing strategies are ruthlessly founded in science and evidence based action.  We could all do well to learn their lessons.

Posted in: BlogOnline MarketingSEOWebsites | No Comments
Share

« Older Entries

Recent Posts

  • Digital Marketing Is Still Marketing »
  • ‘Simple’ Sells Better Online »
  • Storytellers Should Lead Next Generation Search Engine Optimisation »
  • The Customer Isn’t Always Right »
  • Trappings vs. Substance in Digital Marketing »
  • Blame the Web, not Rates on Retail Decline »
  • Why Some Irish Tech Businesses Grow and Others Don’t »
  • Why Do Small Businesses Make Big YouTube Videos? »
  • Top 5 Reasons Why We Fail to Use Analytics Wisely »
  • You’re Sitting on a Goldmine of Sales Leads »

Archives

  • May 2012 »
  • April 2012 »
  • March 2012 »
  • February 2012 »
  • January 2012 »
  • December 2011 »
  • November 2011 »
  • October 2011 »
  • September 2011 »
  • August 2011 »
  • July 2011 »
  • June 2011 »
  • May 2011 »
  • April 2011 »
  • March 2011 »
  • February 2011 »
  • January 2011 »
  • December 2010 »
  • November 2010 »
  • October 2010 »
  • September 2010 »
  • August 2010 »
  • July 2010 »
  • June 2010 »
  • May 2010 »
  • April 2010 »
  • March 2010 »
  • February 2010 »
  • January 2010 »
  • December 2009 »
  • November 2009 »
  • October 2009 »
  • September 2009 »
  • August 2009 »
  • July 2009 »
  • June 2009 »
  • May 2009 »
  • March 2009 »
  • February 2009 »
  • January 2009 »
  • December 2008 »
  • November 2008 »
Sign-up for our Blog Digest
* Denotes mandatory field
iON Results Driven Intelligence © 2012
Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Like us on Facebook